Behavioral Theories of Leadership
Behavioral Theory of leadership is a big leap from Trait Theory, as it was developed scientifically by conducting behaviour focused studies. The theory emphasizes that leadership capability can be learned, rather than being inherent. This theory is based on the principle that a leader's behaviors can be conditioned in a manner that one can have a specific response to specific stimuli.
Behavioral Theories of Leadership, also known as “The style approach to leadership” focuses on the behavior of the leader and what leaders do and how they act. In the 1940s, two parallel studies on leadership were in progress, one based on traits displayed by leaders, another on the behaviours exhibited by leaders.
- Traits theory assumes that leaders are born, rather than made
- Trait theory concentrates on, what the leaders are
- Great Man Theory and Traits Theory are focused on intrinsic personal characteristics
- Behavioural theories are based upon the belief that great leaders are made, not born
- Behavioural theories concentrate on, what leaders do
- Behavioral approach is based on the leader's beliefs, values, and interpersonal relations
- Considers the Leader's attitude, behavior, opinion, and concern about his followers/organization
- Studies leadership behavior from the point of view of motivation, supervision, and authority
- Behavioural theories assume that specific behavioral patterns of leaders can be acquired
- People can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation.
What are Behaviors?
Behavior is the range of actions and mannerisms made by organisms, systems, or artificial entities in conjunction with their environment, which includes the other systems or organisms around as well as the physical environment.
What is Human Behaviors?
Human behavior refers to the range of behaviors exhibited by humans and which are influenced by culture, attitudes, emotions, values, ethics, authority, rapport, hypnosis, persuasion, coercion and/or genetics. In humans, behavior is believed to be controlled primarily by the endocrine system and the nervous system. Behaviors can be either innate or learned.
Human behavior is experienced throughout an individual’s entire lifetime. It includes the way they act based on different factors such as genetics, social norms, core faith, and attitude. Behavior is impacted by certain traits each individual has. The traits vary from person to person and can produce different actions or behavior from each person.
As the questions about how to measure traits continued to challenge trait theory, researchers began thinking about measuring behavior. While you can’t easily measure confidence or honesty in a person, they noted, you can define a behavior or a set of behaviors that seem to embody the trait.
Beliefs are ideas that people have about the world around them and how it operates. People tend to behave according to their beliefs. Values are assessments of the goodness or badness of various features of one's life. Values form attitudes that guide a person's conduct. Beliefs and values have close interaction. Beliefs become values when they lead to certain favorable or unfavorable consequences.
Researchers define behaviors as observable actions, which makes measuring them more scientifically valid than trying to measure a human personality trait. In this theory, we will focus on two general kinds of behaviors by leaders called task behaviors and relationship behaviors.
What is Behavioral Theory of Leadership?
Behavioral Theory of Leadership is a leadership theory that considers the observable actions and reactions of leaders and followers in a given situation. Behavioral theories focus on how leaders behave and assume that leaders can be made, rather than born, and successful leadership is based on definable, learnable behavior. Behavioral theories of leadership are classified as such because they focus on the study of specific behaviors of a leader. For behavioral theorists, a leader behavior is the best predictor of his leadership influences and as a result, is the best determinant of his or her leadership success.
These theories concentrate on what leaders actually do rather than on their qualities. Different patterns of behavior are observed and categorized as 'styles of leadership'. This area has probably attracted the most attention from practicing managers.
Quotes on behaviors:
“No one really knows why humans do what they do.”
David K. Reynolds
“If you want to change attitudes, start with a change in behavior.”
William Glasser
““Behavior is the mirror in which everyone shows their image.”
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
“It's better to hang out with people better than you. Pick out associates whose behavior is better than yours and you'll drift in that direction.”
Warren Buffett
Overview of Behavioral Theory of Leadership:
Behavioral Theory of leadership is a big leap from Trait Theory, in that it assumes that leadership capability can be learned, rather than being inherent. This theory is based on the principle that behaviors can be conditioned in a manner that one can have a specific response to specific stimuli. Rather than seeking inborn traits this theory looks at what leaders actually do by studying their behaviors in response to different situations, assessing leadership success by studying their actions, and then correlating significant behaviors with success.
The practical application of the theory is that leader’s behavior affects their performance and different leadership behaviors could be appropriate at different times. The best leaders are those who have the adaptability to flex their behavioral style and choose the right style suitable for each situation.
According to this theory, people can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation and certain behavioral patterns may be identified as leadership styles.
Advantages of Behavioral Theory of Leadership:
Behavioral theory promotes the value of leadership styles with an emphasis on concern for people and collaboration. It promotes participative decision making and team development by supporting individual needs and aligning individual and group objectives.
It helps managers evaluate and understand how their behavioral style as a manager affects their relationship with the team and promotes commitment and contribution towards organizational goals.
This theory helps managers find the right balance between different styles of leadership, and helps them decide how to behave as a leader, depending on concerns for people and for productivity.
Criticism / Arguments against - Behavioral Theory of Leadership:
As there were inherent limitations with the Trait approach to leadership, when early researchers ran out of steam in their search for traits, they turned to what leaders did, how they behaved, and came with behavioral theory of leadership. This became the dominant way of approaching leadership within organizations in the 1950s and early 1960s but this theory too had its own limitations.
Behavioral Theory of Leadership proposes leadership styles but a specific leadership style may not be best in all circumstances. When researchers really got to work on this it didn’t seem to validate their assumptions. While behavioral theories may help managers develop particular leadership behaviors but they provide little guidance as to what constitutes effective leadership in different situations.
There were lots of differences and inconsistencies between studies. It was difficult to say which style of leadership was significant in enabling one group to work better than another. The styles that leaders can adopt are far more affected by those they are working with, and the environment they are operating within than had been originally thought. Most researchers today conclude that no one leadership style is right for every manager under all circumstances.
Two Important Behavioral Studies:
The first and foremost study on leadership was carried out by a psychologist, Kurt Lewin, and his associates in 1939 and identified different styles of leadership, viz. autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership. Subsequently, many research studies could be categorized under the heading of the behavioral approach leading to the identification of various leadership styles and their correlation with measures of effectiveness. The following three studies are strongly representative of the ideas in this approach:
By looking closely at each of these groups of studies, we can draw a clearer picture of the key concepts and implications of the style/behavioral approach to leadership.
Of these three the two Key Studies in behavioral theory at the University of Michigan and Ohio State University became famous in the next generation of leadership research. These studies identified two key behavioral categories
- Orientation toward task: Task behaviors facilitate goal accomplishment and help the team to achieve its objectives.
- Orientation toward people: Relationship behaviors help team members feel comfortable with themselves, with each other, and with the situation in which they find themselves.
List of Behavioral Theories:
Given below is a list of theories and articles that are also classified under behavioral theories or should be read to understand behavioral theories:
- Action Centered Leadership
- Continuum of leadership
- Four Factor Leadership Theory
- Freud Personality Types
- Functional leadership theory
- Iowa Studies
- Jung Personality Types
- Katz’s Three-Skill Approach
- Lewin’s Change Management Model
- Likerts Management System
- Managerial Grid Theory
- McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y
- Michigan Studies
- Ohio State Studies
- Psychodynamic Approach
- Skills Approach to Leadership
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
Authentic leadership is a new approach to leadership in which leaders are genuine, self-aware, transparent, build honest relationships, and work on an ethical foundation. Authenticity is one of the core values of leadership. Authentic leaders have truthful self-concepts and they inspire by promoting openness by acting in a real, genuine, and sincere way. Authenticity requires self-awareness and the ability to act in accordance with one's true self.
-
David Kolb produced this popular model for learning in 1984. The model suggests four stages of learning which most learners go through in order to learn effectively. Leaming is itself a process of change. Something is added to our perception and prepared us for the next impression, which will change our understanding yet more, however minutely. The Kolb contribution is a significant one because it practically equates change and learning.
-
All the teams are dynamic in nature and they take time to come together, they form, develop, and grow in stages, over a period of time. Teams go through five progressive stages: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning. In this article, we want to introduce you to these stages of team development and certain strategies that you can use to help the team grow and develop in each of these stages.
-
According to the three-skill approach of Katz, the individual's leadership abilities vary depending on where leaders are in a management hierarchy. The practical implication of skills approach to leadership is that leaders can improve their capabilities in leadership skills through training and experience.
-
Attribution Theory of Leadership
The attribution theory of leadership deals with the formation of individual opinions about the reasons for particular events or observations. People will always try to understand why people do what they do. The leader will make a judgment about his employees based on his attribution of the causes of the employees' performance. Individuals will also make inferences about the leader and react to poor performance by the leader.
-
Idiosyncrasy Credit Model of Leadership builds upon the awareness that when the emergent leader meets the team's expectations, idiosyncrasy credits are awarded. These credits depend on how the leader fulfilled follower's expectations and what is the impact of the leader's decisions on the follower. When the balance of credits shifts, another leader will emerge.
-
In the field of communication studies, there are numerous models. No one model is suitable for all purposes and all levels of analysis. Some common models are known as Lasswell Model, George Gerbner Model, David Berlo Model, Shanon and Weaver Model, Osgoods Model, and Schramm Model. All these describe the four components of the communication process, namely, the source (communicator), the message, the channel, the receiver (audience).
-
Self-leadership is a normative model of self-influence by the use of several behavioral strategies to gain a comprehensive self-influence perspective about oneself. Self-leadership is developing an understanding of your capabilities and abilities to influence your own communication, emotions, and behaviors to lead and influence others. Self-leadership is about personal growth and developing foresight.
-
Leadership traits refer to personal qualities that define effective leaders. Here are the major leadership qualities that can make someone a good leader. Five key traits that are common in leaders can be learned and sharpened with time.
-
Strategic Contingencies Theory is a theory of intra-organizational power. The power of a subunit or individual depends on a few contingencies and that the more contingencies are controlled by a subunit, the greater is its power. The theory focuses on tasks that need to be done in the form of problems to be solved, thus de-emphasizing personality.
